

What if the next data breach in your organization doesn’t come from an external attacker, but from your most trusted employee? Would you be able to detect it in time, or would the surprise leave you unprepared to respond? While firewalls and modern monitoring solutions play an important role in security, they often overlook one critical risk: the insider threat.
An insider threat is an internal actor who can potentially harm the security of an organization. Whether intentional or not, the individual’s authorized access and knowledge can be used in ways that go against expectations and compromise the infrastructure.
In cybersecurity, insider threats are harder to prevent and anticipate than external threats or hackers. This is due to several factors, including risks from unexpected sources, emotionally rooted trust, and actions that appear legitimate yet are harmful.
The first type that comes to mind! A spy in disguise, spending time faking tasks and gaining trust while secretly serving different intentions.
A malicious insider will intentionally leak sensitive data, sabotage the system, or work with cybercriminals to disrupt confidentiality and availability.
May of 2023 marked the time of a massive data leak at Tesla. Two former employees leaked more than 75,000 individuals’ personal information, including phone numbers, addresses, social security numbers, salaries, and more.
These two insiders used their legitimate access to internal files and shared them with a German media outlet. While the direct motive is not precise, it’s suggested to be whistleblowing, recognition, or financial opportunities through media exposure.
While the news often focuses on these stories, the public image of insider threats stays limited to malicious actors, dramatic situations, and strong evil intentions. However, the truth is very different.
In most cases, breaches occur by mistake, caused by a negligent, careless insider.
Here are the human factors at play, and the psychology behind cyber mistakes:
In 2016, Morgan Stanley disclosed that sensitive customer data was exposed due to improper handling of decommissioned IT equipment by a contractor. Devices were retired, and the vendor failed to properly destroy data, making sensitive client information recoverable and affecting millions of customers.
While this incident did not stem from malicious intent, failures in data destruction procedures and operational negligence led to a major breach. As a result, Morgan Stanley was fined millions for failing to safeguard customer data.
These employees are not malicious, nor are they careless with technology. Instead, they are targeted by external hackers and unknowingly become a gateway into the system. Hackers then gain legitimate-looking access without raising suspicion.
This typically occurs through various techniques aimed at the individual, including malware, phishing attacks, and manipulative social engineering. Rather than attacking the organization’s infrastructure directly, these methods focus on exploiting the employee.
In August 2022, Cisco disclosed that an attacker gained access to its internal systems after compromising an employee’s personal Google account. Once the account was taken over, the attacker was able to obtain corporate credentials and use them to access internal company resources. Because the activity relied on valid credentials and originated from a trusted identity, it was difficult to distinguish from legitimate behavior.
This incident illustrates how insider threats can emerge without malicious intent from the employee, how identity and credential management failures can collapse trust boundaries, and why detecting compromised insiders remains one of the hardest challenges in cybersecurity.
Detecting insider threats is not an easy game. These threats originate from normal activities and legitimate operations, unlike the suspicious behaviors SIEMs are designed to detect.
Basic security measures are no longer as effective; organizations must look for behavioral indicators to understand humans and identify potential threats. Such as:
Insider threats can be more costly and damaging than external attacks. This underscores the need to set your priorities and make insider threat mitigation a top choice. Here are the key ideas to take with you: